🔗 Share this article

Apple may have to allow competitors to operate their own application platforms on iPhones across Britain, after a decision from the competition regulator.

This would be a major shift to the company's well-known "closed system" where apps can only be downloaded from its own App Store.

But the UK competition watchdog has designated both the tech giants as having "strategic market status" - indicating they have significant control over mobile platforms.

Watchdog Assessment

The regulator said the tech firms "could be restricting progress and competition".

But the regulator clarified it did not "find or assume wrongdoing" from the firms.

"Mobile applications generates 1.5% of the British economy and sustains around four hundred thousand positions, which is why it's essential these markets function properly for enterprises," commented a senior official from the CMA.

Around ninety to one hundred percent of UK mobile devices operate using Apple or Google's operating systems, creating what the authority calls an "effective duopoly".

Based on current data, 48.5% of British smartphone users own an iPhone - which runs the iOS operating system - with the overwhelming bulk of the rest using the Android OS.

The Company's Reaction

The regulatory probe examined how dominant Apple and Google's own apps are versus rivals - as well as their browsers and platform software.

It is unclear what modifications the regulator will seek to implement, but previously it published roadmaps detailing potential measures it could take.

These comprise mandating it to be easier for people to transition between iOS and Android devices, and for both companies to rank apps "fairly and openly" in their marketplaces.

The Cupertino company specifically may be required to permit alternative app stores on its devices, and enable people to install apps straight from companies' websites.

This would mirror comparable regulations in the EU, which previously imposed measures against Apple for anti-competitive behaviour.

Apple warned the United Kingdom could lose access to getting new features - as has occurred in the European Union - which the organization blames on strict rules.

For example, some AI capabilities which have been rolled out in other regions are not available in the EU.

"We encounters fierce competition in every market where we operate, and we work tirelessly to create the best products, services and customer interface," the organization said in a statement.

"The UK's adoption of European regulations would weaken that, resulting in consumers with reduced data protection and safety, slower availability to new features, and a fragmented, more complicated user journey."

The Search Giant's Position

Google device owners can currently use alternative marketplaces - though commentators say they are not as smooth as the company's official application marketplace.

The regulator's plan said Google may have to "change the user experience" of installing applications directly from online sources, as well as "remove user frictions" when using alternative app stores.

"There appears to be no the rationale for today's designation decision," a company policy executive remarked.

The executive said "the majority" of Google device owners use alternative app stores or download apps straight from a developer's website, and claimed there is a far greater range of apps offered for Android users versus those on iOS products.

"Currently available are 24,000 Google-compatible devices from thirteen hundred device makers worldwide, facing strong rivalry from Apple's platform in the UK," the spokesperson added.

Google's platform is an freely available software, which means developers can utilize and develop on top of it for no cost.

Google argues this means it opens up competition.

But advocacy organizations said restrictions on these companies' power in other countries "currently assist businesses to innovate and providing consumers more choice".

"Their dominance is now creating genuine problems by restricting choice for users and market rivalry for businesses," commented a consumer advocate.