🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.