🔗 Share this article

Thhese days showcase a quite distinctive situation: the inaugural US parade of the caretakers. They vary in their expertise and attributes, but they all have the same mission – to avert an Israeli infringement, or even devastation, of the delicate truce. Since the hostilities ended, there have been rare days without at least one of the former president's delegates on the territory. Just recently featured the presence of Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff, a senator and Marco Rubio – all coming to carry out their roles.

The Israeli government occupies their time. In just a few short period it launched a set of strikes in the region after the loss of two Israel Defense Forces (IDF) troops – resulting, as reported, in scores of Palestinian fatalities. A number of leaders demanded a renewal of the fighting, and the Knesset passed a early decision to incorporate the West Bank. The US response was somewhere between “no” and “hell no.”

Yet in more than one sense, the American government appears more intent on maintaining the present, unstable period of the peace than on moving to the following: the rehabilitation of Gaza. Concerning that, it looks the United States may have aspirations but few concrete proposals.

For now, it remains uncertain when the proposed global administrative entity will effectively take power, and the similar is true for the designated military contingent – or even the makeup of its members. On a recent day, Vance declared the United States would not force the structure of the international unit on Israel. But if the prime minister's government keeps to refuse various proposals – as it did with the Turkish offer this week – what follows? There is also the contrary issue: which party will establish whether the troops preferred by Israel are even interested in the task?

The issue of the timeframe it will need to demilitarize the militant group is just as vague. “Our hope in the administration is that the international security force is going to now take charge in disarming the organization,” said Vance recently. “It’s going to take some time.” The former president only emphasized the lack of clarity, declaring in an discussion recently that there is no “hard” schedule for Hamas to demilitarize. So, in theory, the unnamed participants of this yet-to-be-formed global contingent could deploy to Gaza while Hamas members continue to wield influence. Would they be facing a governing body or a guerrilla movement? These represent only some of the concerns surfacing. Some might ask what the verdict will be for everyday Palestinians under current conditions, with Hamas continuing to attack its own adversaries and dissidents.

Latest developments have once again underscored the blind spots of local reporting on each side of the Gaza frontier. Each publication seeks to scrutinize every possible perspective of the group's breaches of the truce. And, usually, the reality that Hamas has been hindering the repatriation of the remains of slain Israeli hostages has monopolized the news.

By contrast, coverage of non-combatant casualties in the region caused by Israeli strikes has garnered minimal attention – if any. Take the Israeli counter strikes in the wake of Sunday’s southern Gaza incident, in which two soldiers were fatally wounded. While local authorities claimed 44 casualties, Israeli television analysts criticised the “light response,” which focused on solely facilities.

That is typical. Over the previous few days, the press agency accused Israel of violating the peace with the group multiple occasions since the ceasefire came into effect, causing the death of 38 individuals and wounding an additional 143. The allegation seemed unimportant to most Israeli news programmes – it was just missing. This applied to accounts that 11 members of a Palestinian household were lost their lives by Israeli forces recently.

Gaza’s emergency services reported the group had been attempting to return to their residence in the Zeitoun district of Gaza City when the bus they were in was attacked for reportedly passing the “yellow line” that demarcates zones under Israeli military authority. That boundary is invisible to the ordinary view and shows up just on plans and in government records – sometimes not available to everyday residents in the region.

Even this incident hardly rated a reference in Israeli news outlets. One source mentioned it shortly on its online platform, referencing an IDF official who explained that after a suspicious vehicle was identified, forces fired warning shots towards it, “but the vehicle continued to advance on the soldiers in a manner that created an immediate threat to them. The forces opened fire to remove the risk, in accordance with the ceasefire.” Zero injuries were claimed.

Amid this narrative, it is understandable many Israelis believe Hamas solely is to at fault for violating the ceasefire. That perception threatens prompting appeals for a more aggressive stance in the region.

Eventually – possibly sooner than expected – it will no longer be enough for all the president’s men to play kindergarten teachers, advising the Israeli government what to refrain from. They will {have to|need